Cultural appropriation vs. appreciation: where is the line drawn when it comes to clothing, art and the like?


The conflict over cultural appropriation ignites over seemingly simple things: a dress with Indigenous patterns on the runway, a white artist making reggae music, or a hipster wearing a feathered headdress at a festival. But beneath the surface simmers one of the most intense cultural debates of our time. It raises fundamental questions: Does culture belong to everyone? Where does inspiration end and theft begin? And who gets to decide? This comprehensive article analyzes the complex boundary between appropriation and appreciation in concrete areas like fashion, art, music, and lifestyle – and provides nuanced guidance for a respectful global society.

The Fundamental Definition: What is Cultural Appropriation Really?

Cultural Appropriation describes the process by which members of a dominant culture adopt elements of a marginalized culture – often without understanding, permission, or proper acknowledgment. The critical point is the dynamic of power and history. It’s not about any cultural exchange, but specifically about an imbalance where the adopting group has historically oppressed, exploited, or devalued the originating group and now benefits from their cultural expressions, while the originating group continues to face discrimination.

The Four Main Characteristics of Cultural Appropriation:

  1. Decontextualization: Symbols, styles, or rituals are ripped from their original cultural, spiritual, or historical context.
  2. Commercialization: The cultural elements are turned into profit without the originating community deciding, controlling, or sharing fairly in the profits.
  3. Trivialization and Stereotyping: Profound cultural expressions are degraded into superficial fashion trends or clichés.
  4. Denial of Source: The origin is obscured, not acknowledged, or the creators remain invisible and uncompensated.

Case Area 1: Fashion and Aesthetics – When Clothing Becomes Political

The fashion industry is a hotspot of the debate. From Indigenous embroidery to African hairstyles: when does wearing become a travesty?

Critical Example: The “Native Print” Trend

Major fashion houses like Victoria’s Secret (models with feather headdresses) or Urban Outfitters (selling “Navajo” underwear) faced massive criticism. The problem: Indigenous communities, whose traditional garments and patterns communicate spiritual meaning, clan affiliation, and earned honor, see these signs marketed as profane mass-produced goods. The feather headdress (War Bonnet), for example, is a sacred item of honor in many Plains cultures, earned through acts of bravery. Worn as a party accessory, it is a profound insult.

The Gray Area: Inspiration vs. Copy

Not every reference is appropriation. If a designer collaborates with Indigenous artists, names them, pays them fairly, and explains the cultural significance, it can be appreciation. Indigenous designer Bethany Yellowtail (Crow/Northern Cheyenne) shows how fashion design can be cultural storytelling and sovereignty when it comes from within.

Case Area 2: Art, Music, and Performance

Art is often seen as universal – but who tells which story?

The Problem of “Voice Appropriation”

When a white painter creates works in the style of Aboriginal art and fetches high prices, while Aboriginal artists struggle for recognition, that is appropriation. When non-Black musicians dominate genres like blues, jazz, or hip-hop, which originated from specific Black experiences of suffering and resistance, questions of authenticity and justice arise. The history of the exploitation of Black music by white performers (from Elvis Presley to current debates in the rap scene) is a case study here.

Appreciation in Art: Collaboration and Context

Appreciation means centering the storytellers. It means supporting Indigenous galleries, buying art directly from the artists, and engaging, as a non-Indigenous person, with the political reality behind the art. Documenta 15 in 2022 set a strong example for a paradigm shift with its collective, non-Western approach.

Case Area 3: Body Modification, Hairstyles, and Spirituality

On our bodies, the boundary becomes particularly personal – and particularly painful.

Dreadlocks, Boxer Braids, and Bindi

When white celebrities like Kim Kardashian present “Boxer Braids” as a new trend (actually Fulani or cornrows, a traditional African hairstyle), while Black people with the same hairstyles face discrimination in school and the workplace, that is the core of appropriation: What is deemed “unprofessional” on one group is marketed as a “cool trend” on another. The same applies to wearing a bindi (a religious Hindu symbol) as a festival accessory.

Tattoos with Cultural Symbols

A tattoo featuring a Polynesian tatau, a Celtic rune, or a Japanese Oni mask without understanding their deep cultural, spiritual, or genealogical significance is problematic. It reduces living cultural systems to aesthetic decoration.

Case Area 4: Cuisine and Lifestyle

Food is culture – but who cooks it and under what conditions?

The “Ethnic Food” Industry

When a white chef opens an “authentic” Mexican restaurant and reaps fame, while Mexican cooks remain invisible in the kitchen or are themselves only allowed to run taco stands, this reproduces economic inequalities. Appreciation would be promoting Mexican head chefs, acknowledging the origin of dishes, and forming fair partnerships.

Yoga, Meditation, and Wellness

The billion-dollar wellness industry has completely decontextualized Hindu and Buddhist practices. Yoga is sold as a mere fitness program, while its spiritual roots and the communities from which it originates are rendered invisible. Appreciation would be supporting Indian yoga teachers and mentioning the cultural context in classes.

The Path to Appreciation: 7 Concrete Guidelines

How can we be culturally inspired without causing harm? These guiding questions offer orientation:

  1. Ask About Power and History: Do I, as a member of a dominant group, historically stand in a power relationship to the culture of origin? Has my group oppressed or exploited this culture?
  2. Seek Active Consent and Collaboration: Is there explicit permission from legitimate representatives of the culture? Even better: can I work with them instead of over them?
  3. Acknowledge the Source Comprehensively: Don’t just say “inspired by,” but name names, specific cultures, and contexts. Make the creators visible and support them financially.
  4. Question Your Motivation: Why am I drawn to this specific element? Am I seeking exoticism, or do I understand the deeper meaning? Can I even honor this meaning appropriately in my context?
  5. Acknowledge Internal Diversity: A culture is not a monolith. There are debates within every community about what may be shared. Listen to different voices.
  6. Prioritize the Access of the Originating Community: Ensure the community itself has primary access to and control over its cultural expressions.
  7. Learn the History and the Struggles: Genuine appreciation begins with understanding the political and social realities of the culture, not just adopting its aesthetic elements.

Most Common Objections – and Responses

“But cultures have always influenced each other!”
Yes, but mostly through trade, migration, or on an equal footing. Cultural appropriation describes the specific, unequal exchange in the context of colonialism and structural racism.
“That’s just political correctness gone too far!”
For the affected communities, it’s not about “political correctness,” but about respect, economic justice, and psychological harm. Their pain is real and deserves to be heard.
“Then as a German, I shouldn’t eat pizza either!”
Italians in Europe are not a marginalized group systematically oppressed by Germans. The power dynamic is key. Eating pizza is cultural exchange. Selling an Indigenous healing ritual is appropriation.
“Doesn’t this stifle artistic freedom?”
Artistic freedom ends where it violates the dignity and rights of others. Furthermore: true creativity finds ways to be inspired without uprooting and harming.

Conclusion: From Appropriation to Reciprocity

The debate about cultural appropriation is, at its core, a call for more awareness, humility, and justice in a globalized world. It challenges us to reflect on our position and our privileges.

The line between appropriation and appreciation does not run between “no contact” and “all contact.” It runs between exploitation and reciprocity, between ignorance and responsible engagement, between uprooting and context-aware inspiration.

Ultimately, it’s about moving from an attitude of Entitled Take (“I’ll take what I like”) to one of Respectful Exchange (“I engage in respectful dialogue and exchange”). In a world marked by colonial wounds, genuine appreciation can only grow where we are willing to listen, share power, and consider justice. That is the foundation for a truly enriching cultural exchange that benefits everyone – without hurting or robbing anyone.

Leave a Comment

Ihr dirk bachhausen. “der kleine hamster will nicht hamstern” von anne hassel : ein herbstbuch.